Contact Us
(248) 263-6800
 
 

Motion to Suppress - Consent-Once-Removed Roctrine

Posted: 01/01/2012
The consent-once-removed doctrine applies to the warrantless entry into a residence by backup officers summoned to assist an undercover officer with making an arrest when the undercover officer’s initial entry into the residence was based on consent of someone with authority to consent.
The doctrine is based on the theory that, because an undercover officer who establishes probable cause to arrest the suspect may in fact arrest the suspect then and there, the undercover officer should be entitled to call in the officer with whom he is working to assist in the arrest.
In O’Neill v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Gov’t, the plaintiff granted two undercover officers permission to enter the home. The undercover officers spoke with the plaintiff and then left the residence. The undercover officers returned momentarily with several uniformed officers. The officers then entered the plaintiff’s home without a warrant or consent. Inside the residence, the officers seized property, but never arrested or intended to arrest anyone.
The consent-once-removed doctrine allows officers to enter a suspect’s residence to arrest the suspect without a warrant if undercover officers entered at the express invitation of someone with authority to consent; at that point the undercover officers established the existence of probable cause to effectuate an arrest or search; and the undercover officers immediately summoned help from other officers. The intent of the entry by the backup officers must be to immediately effectuate an arrest.
The Court refused to extend the consent-once-removed doctrine to this case because the undercover officers had left the residence and the backup officers did not rush in to effectuate an arrest nor did they intend to make an arrest inside the residence. Essentially, because there was a separation of time between when the undercover officers where given consent to enter the residence and when the backup officers arrived, the consent-once-removed doctrine did not apply, the evidence was properly suppressed and the case was dismissed.
Mr. Loren Dickstein, Esq.
Michigan Criminal Defense Attorney
LEWIS & DICKSTEIN, P.L.L.C.
2000 Town Center, Ste. 2350
Southfield, MI   48075
(248) 263-6800 - Fax: (248) 357-1371
AvvoRated: 10.0 Superb
MartindaleRated: Preeminent - AV
PRESS RELEASE - Loren M. Dickstein awarded Federal Certificate of Appreciation
    Loren M. ***stein, Michigan Criminal Defense Attorney and Partner with Lewis & ***stein, P.L.L.C., has been awarded the Certificate of Appreciation from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of...
Read More...
How to Hire a Michigan Criminal Defense Attorney
If you find yourself charged with or considered a suspect in a misdemeanor or felony, you will need a Michigan criminal defense attorney to help you. But if you’ve never needed a criminal lawyer before, you may not know how to go about finding...
Read More...
Listing of Abbreviations On Driving Records - Michigan Drivers License Restoration Attorney
Many clients who hire me to handle a drivers license restoration appeal before the DLAD (this means when they are requesting restoration of driving privileges revoked due to habitual DUI, OWI, DWI or other drunk driving convictions) frequently ask...
Read More...
Local municipalites are now allowed to enforce Michigan's "Super Drunk" law.
Back in 2010, Michigan adopted a new drinking and driving law referred to as the “super drunk” law. The law states that if you were caught drinking and driving and your blood alcohol level was that of 0.17 or higher, you can be...
Read More...
The Supreme Court, in its infinite wisdom, has ruled that imprisonment does not necessarily constitute custody for purposes of triggering the right to Miranda warnings.
Is it possible that a person could NOT be in custody if the person is in PRISON? Unbelievably…YES   The Supreme Court, in its infinite wisdom, has ruled that imprisonment does not necessarily constitute custody for purposes of...
Read More...
PRESS RELEASE - Lewis and Dickstein PLLC Receives 2012 Best of Southfield Award
  NEW YORK, NY, April 19, 2012 -- Lewis and ***stein PLLC has been selected for the 2012 Best of Southfield Award in the ...
Read More...
Operating With the Presence of Marijuana or other Schedule 1 Controlled Substances (OUIN)
VEHICLE CODE AND MEDICAL MARIHUANA   The Michigan State Police recently trained state troopers that, "a person shall not operate a motor vehicle with any amount of a Schedule 1 controlled substance, including medical marihuana, in the...
Read More...
Michigan's Motorcycle Helmet Law is Repealed
Michigan Compiled Law 257.658 repealed the law requiring all operators of motorcycles in Michigan to wear a protective helmet. The repeal is effective immediately.  Michigan’s mandatory motorcycle helmet requirement was repealed...
Read More...
Michigan's Top 50 Felonies - Criminal Defense Lawyer
  As one of Michigan’s premier criminal defense law firms, LEWIS & ***STEIN, P.L.L.C., requires all partners and associates to regularly engage in continuing legal education (CLE) and trail skills workshops. CLE can take many...
Read More...
Michigan Court of Appeals rules that underrepresentation of a race in a jury venire does not constitute reversible error.
In the case of People v. Reginald Salter, Michigan Court of Appeals case no. 300272, the defendant was charged with first-degree premeditated murder, MCL 750.316(1)(a), felon in possession of a firearm, MCL 750.224f, and possession of a firearm...
Read More...
Canada Announces New, Relaxed Entry Rules for Americans with Minor Criminal Records - Michigan Criminal Defense Attorney
  There is great news for Americans who have been convicted of first offense drunk driving, OWI, DUI or other impaired driving offenses, Canada has started to relax the entry restrictions that have been in place for years. ...
Read More...
"If I hire you, can you guarantee you will win?"
It is unethical for a lawyer to promise a client certain results.  In Michigan, the Rules of Professional Conduct govern a lawyer’s conduct. Making promises and/or guarantees with the purpose of fraudulently inducing a client to make...
Read More...
What are the possible consequences for a domestic violence conviction? A Criminal Defense Attorney's Perspective
From the perspective of nationally recognized domestic violence defense lawyers: What are the possible consequences for a domestic violence conviction?   If your convicted of domestic violence as a result of a plea or conviction at...
Read More...
Can a juror follow the Constitutional principle that he or she is prohibited from considering as evidence whether the defendant testifies at trial?
I’m current in trial in an armed robbery case in the 6th Judicial Circuit Court in Oakland County, Michigan. As we picked the jury last Thursday, a process called voir dire, I delved into an issue that never fails to be an issue in a jury...
Read More...
How long will it take to get a decision on my appeal?
 Michigan Criminal Appeals Attorney
How long will it take to get a decision on my appeal?
   According to the Michigan Court of Appeals, the time frame for deciding an appeal depends on various factors. Certain cases, such as child custody matters (including child abuse...
Read More...
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  - All
Superb AVVO Rating!

Free Consultation

* Indicates required questions
Name *
First Last
Email *
Phone # *
How can we help you? *
VerificationCode
Enter code in image: