Court of Appeals says that the State has jurisdiction to prosecute some crimes committed on Indian land.

If you find yourself being charged with a crime on Indian Territory, you will want to hire a criminal defense attorney.  The Michigan Court of Appeals has recently issued an opinion regarding the states jurisdictional powers over certain crimes committed on Indian land.  The cases of People v. Collins, COA number 300644, and People v. Mason, COA number 300645, both involve criminal drug offenses under a state statute,MCL 333.7401.  Defendant Collins was charged was charged with Delivery of a Controlled Substance, Methylphenidate (Ritalin), and defendant Mason was charged with Possession with Intent to Deliver a Controlled Substance, Marijuana.

 

The prosecution appealed as of right.  After reviewing the cases, the Michigan Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the cases for reinstitution of the charges against the defendants.  In their opinion, the appeals court stated “On the basis of opinions issued by the United States Supreme Court, which constitute binding precedent, along with persuasive precedent emanating from numerous state and lower federal courts, we hold that state courts in Michigan have jurisdiction relative to a criminal prosecution in which a non-Indian defendant committed a”victimless” offense on Indian lands or in Indian country.”

 

The same attorney represented both defendants.  The attorney filed motions to dismiss for lack of territorial jurisdiction in the circuit court.  The circuit court granted the dismissals stating “In conclusion, this Court can find no authority that gives the State Court jurisdiction for this matter.  Since the Tribal Courts clearly do not have jurisdiction either, it would necessarily follow that the Federal Courts have exclusive jurisdiction over these criminal prosecutions.  It appears the Federal Government has never chosen to share its jurisdiction over these matters with the State of Michigan. 


Jurisdictional issues in connection with crimes occurring in Indian country are governed by federal, state, and tribal law.  In the case of Duro v. Reina, 495 US 676, 680 n 1: 110 S Ct 2053; 109 L Ed 2d 693 (1990), the Court stated that for Indian country crimes involving only non-Indians, longstanding precedents of this Court hold that state courts have exclusive jurisdiction.  A good criminal defense attorney in Michigan is one who is well versed in State and Federal Laws. 

 

The attorneys at LEWIS & DICKSTEIN, P.L.L.C. have over 40 years of collective experience regarding criminal matters in the state and federal courts.  Call today to speak to one of our criminal defense attorneys directly at (248) 263-6800 or fill out a Request for Information Form and one of our lawyers will contact you as soon as possible.